Human thriving and the law

• 作者： Foster, Charles, author.
• 其他作者：
  • Herring, Jonathan, author.
  • SpringerLink (Online service)
• 其他題名：
  • SpringerBriefs in law.
• 出版： Cham : Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer
• 叢書名： SpringerBriefs in law,
• 主題： Health facilities--Law and legislation. , Medical care--Finance--Law and legislation. , Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. , Law and Psychology. , Quality of Life Research. , Philosophy of Law. , Business Ethics. , Human Rights.
• ISBN： 9783030011352 (electronic bk.) 、 9783030011345 (paper)
• FIND@SFXID: CGU
• 資料類型: 電子書
• 內容註: Preface -- Chapter 1: What does the law say about human thriving? -- Chapter 2: The idea of human thriving: A brief history -- Chapter 3: What makes humans happy? -- Chapter 4: Thriving, care, and vulnerability -- Chapter 5: Making it work: ideas of human thriving in practice -- Chapter 6: Conclusion.
• More
• 摘要註: The idea of the Good Life - of what constitutes human thriving, is, implicitly, the foundation and justification of the law. The law exists to hold societies together; to hold in tension the rights of individuals as against individuals, the rights of individuals as against various types of non-humans such as corporations (and vice versa), and the rights of individuals individuals as against the state (and vice versa) In democratic states, laws inhibit some freedoms in the name of greater, or more desirable freedoms. The only justification for law is surely that it tends to promote human thriving. But what is the Good Life? What does it mean to live a thriving life? There has been no want of discussion, at least since the great Athenians. But surprisingly, since human thriving is its sole raison d'etre, the law has been slow to contribute to the conversation. This book aims to start and facilitate this conversation. It aims to: -make lawyers ask: 'What is the law for?', and conclude that it is to maximise human thriving -make lawyers ask: 'But what does human thriving mean?' -make judges and advocates ask: 'How can a judgment about the best interests of a patient be satisfactory unless its basis is made clear?'.
• 讀者標籤：

  需登入
• 引用連結：

  Copy Link
• 目前引用數
• Share: