資料來源:
三民書局
Welfare and capitalism in postwar Japan [electronic resource]
- 作者： Est�vez-Abe, Margarita, 1962-.
- 出版： Cambridge ;New York : Cambridge University Press
- 叢書名： Cambridge studies in comparative politics
- 主題： Public welfare--Japan--History. , Welfare state--Japan. , Japan--Economic conditions. , Electronic books.
- ISBN： 9780521856935 (hdbk.) 、 0521856930 (hdbk.) 、 9780521722216 (pbk.) 、 0521722217 (pbk.) 、 9780511510069
-
FIND@SFXID:
CGU
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 內容註: Includes bibliographical references (p. 297-327) and index. Rashomon: the Japanese welfare state in a comparative perspective -- Structural logics of welfare politics -- Historical patterns of structural logic in postwar Japan - - The rise of the Japanese social protection system in the 1950s -- Economic growth and Japan's selective welfare expansion -- Institutional complemetarities and the Japanese welfare capitalism -- The emergence of trouble in the 1970s -- Policy shifts in the 1990s: the emergence of European-style welfare politics -- The end of Japan's social protection as we know it: becoming like Britain?.
-
讀者標籤：
- 系統號： 005049531 | 機讀編目格式
館藏資訊
This book explains how postwar Japan managed to achieve a highly egalitarian form of capitalism despite meager social spending. Estevez-Abe develops an institutional, rational-choice model to solve this puzzle. She shows how Japan's electoral system generated incentives that led political actors to protect various groups that lost out in market competition. She explains how Japan's postwar welfare state relied upon various alternatives to orthodox social spending programs. The initial postwar success of Japan's political economy has given way to periods of crisis and reform. This book follows this story up to the present day. Estevez-Abe shows how the current electoral system renders obsolete the old form of social protection. She argues that institutionally Japan now resembles Britain and predicts that Japan's welfare system will also come to resemble Britain's. Japan thus faces a more market-oriented society and less equality.